GPU-accelerated ALM platform
Every valuation and reserve workload completes in under 10 seconds. Nested stochastic VM-21 ASPA — which takes days on legacy systems — completes in under 2 minutes.
The problem
Every carrier pays for the actuarial engine and the entire data infrastructure built around it to store, query, and reconcile results. The second bill is often larger than the first.
Prophet, AXIS, MG-ALFA. Annual licenses, runtime infrastructure, internal modeling team. The line item the CFO already sees.
Results warehouse. ETL pipelines. BI dashboards. A reconciliation team to chase down stale numbers. None of it actuarial work — all of it a workaround for batch compute.
What batch computing required
Your team built the right infrastructure for the tools that were available. Now better tools exist.
The fix
Inputs are megabytes. Results are terabytes. Assumptions, scenarios, portfolios — all small, versioned, auditable.
For per-policy detail, the audit trace produces per-period cash flows, state distributions, and reserves for any single contract in milliseconds. You get the detail without storing the detail.
Side by side
| Current infrastructure | InstaVal approach | Savings opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| Results warehouse | Rerun on demand | $100K – $1M+ / yr |
| ETL pipelines (engine → warehouse) | None needed | 1 – 3 FTEs |
| BI dashboards on stored results | Direct UI against live runs | Tool licenses + FTEs |
| Results retention (7+ years) | Input retention (1000× smaller) | Storage + backup + DR |
| Reconciliation team | Not possible — always current | 2 – 4 FTEs |
| "Which run produced this?" | Sequence IDs + deterministic reruns | Audit overhead |
The proof
Every valuation and reserve workload completes in under 10 seconds. Nested stochastic VM-21 ASPA — which takes days on legacy systems — completes in under 2 minutes.
Below 10 seconds, the interaction feels like a conversation with the system. Actuaries iterate: tweak an assumption, rerun, see the answer, tweak again. That workflow doesn't exist on Prophet/AXIS — and their architecture can't be retrofitted to support it.
The bigger frame
It's competing with Prophet + Snowflake + ETL + Tableau + a data engineering team + a reconciliation team. Priced against that total, even a premium InstaVal license is a rounding error.
Faster is a feature. Eliminating half the carrier's actuarial IT stack is a transformation. The legacy actuarial software industry has spent twenty years building workarounds for slow compute, and those workarounds have become a larger line item than the original software.
A 30-minute conversation: we walk you through the architecture, run a live valuation against a portfolio shape that matches yours, and quantify what the supporting stack is costing you today.